资料图:美国众议院共和党领袖麦卡锡。中新社记者 沙晗汀 摄
由于两党对立加剧、党派内斗、利益分配不均等因素,众议长选举陷入一场拉锯战。在此次众议长竞选中,美国民主党议员继续抱团,多轮投票中,一票不投麦卡锡,共和党右翼“强硬派”领头的约20人小团体也拒绝投票麦卡锡。
麦卡锡的当选之路一波三折,除了本人的“政治投机派”角色在国会不受欢迎外,与共和党内部政治分歧关系密切。
一方面,共和党党内反对者认为,麦卡锡对民主党态度过于软弱,无力对抗民主党控制的参议院和拜登政府,另一方面,因为共和党的多数优势微弱,党内一些影响力较小的派系的政治力量则被放大,有利于他们巩固自己的选票。
此外,党内反对者也认为,自己的选票没有换取更多利益,希望以此作为筹码换取麦卡锡更大的让步,比如让他们获得众议院重要委员会中的职务。
作为仅次于美国总统、副总统的政坛三号人物,众议院议长通常由众议院多数党领袖担任,选举几乎没有悬念。然而,麦卡锡此次为当选,不得不做出多个关键让步,其中可能包括恢复一项罢黜议长动议机制,使得众议长的权力被削弱,难以掌控众议院。
美国有线电视新闻网CNN称,麦卡锡在这场不合时宜的政治勒索中作出让步,这种绥靖政策只会让极端主义势力更加强大。
这场引发全世界围观的尴尬选举暴露出美国政治存在严重的对立和分化。在权力博弈思维的裹挟下,党派利益凌驾于国家和人民利益之上,美国两党相互拆台,陷入“为反对而反对”的无脑对垒。而即便是一党内,也会因为利益分配问题产生不同的小派系,相互对抗,选票变成了谋利益的工具。
从国会山骚乱到打破记历史记录的15轮众议长选举,“对抗式民主”让美国政治陷入瓶颈,长期对抗势必会让政客们丧失客观公正的判断能力,其政治阶层是否有能力治理国家也会引发质疑。
两党之争和党派内斗进一步放大了美国政治体制弊病,美国所谓的“民主”形象,让全世界大跌眼镜。鼓吹以选民利益为先的美式选举,变成了政客们利益置换的游戏,进一步彰显出美国“民主政治”日渐失能,不断极化的党争已使美国政治制度陷入死循环。
House speaker election reveals deep-rooted problems in U.S. democracy
(ECNS) -- The Republican leader Kevin McCarthy was elected as the 55th speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives after 15 ballots. As the most grueling House speaker election in the past 164 years, the election has highlighted the defects of the country’s "confrontational democracy".
The election once reached a stalemate due to intense partisan strife, inner-party struggle among the Republicans, uneven distribution of interests, and more. Democratic Party members forged a close alliance, refusing to vote for McCarthy, while about 20 Republicans also declined to cast ballots for the GOP leader.
Except for his unpopular role as a "political speculator" in Congress, McCarthy’s hard-won election can be attributed to turmoil within the Republican Party.
On the one hand, opponents in the Republican Party believe that the GOP leader's attitude toward the Democrats is too weak to confront the Senate controlled by Democrats and the Biden administration.
On the other hand, the political power of some less influential factions in the Republican Party has been amplified due to the Party’s weak majority advantage in the House of Representatives, which is conducive to consolidating their ticket warehouses.
Meanwhile, these opponents believe that their votes failed to win them more benefits, hoping to use this as a bargaining chip for McCarthy's further concessions, such as getting them positions in important House Committees.
As the third political figure after the President and Vice President of the U.S., the speaker, by tradition, is the head of the majority party in the House of Representatives.
But McCarthy has made many concessions in order to bring the ultra conservatives along, involving what’s known as the “motion to vacate,” a mechanism by which members can force a vote to depose the speaker. The reported concessions will empower individual members at the expense of McCarthy’s sway as speaker.
CNN thought the concessions he made during this unseemly political shakedown would only make the extremist faction more powerful.
This embarrassing election, which has drawn global attention, exposed the serious opposition and polarization in American politics. Both Democrats and Republicans put their interests before that of the country and its people, attacking and opposing each other irrationally.
Besides, different factions arise within a single party and confront each other because of the distribution of interests. Votes have become a tool to win more benefits.
From Capitol riots to the House Speaker election with record-breaking ballots, "confrontational democracy" has become a bottleneck of American politics. Long-term confrontation will surely impede politicians to think objectively and fairly while their capacity of governing the country will also raise doubts among the public.
Both parties’ struggle and infighting among the Republicans have further amplified the defects of the American political system, with its "democratic" image shocking the world.
The U.S.-style election, which advocates putting voters' interests first, has become a game of interest exchange among politicians. In addition, it further demonstrates the malfunction of American "democratic politics" and the constantly polarized party struggle that has trapped the American political system into an infinite cycle.
彰显礼仪之邦大国气质 舞剧《五星出东方》“走红”元宵晚会****** 中新网北京2月16日电 (徐婧)温暖喜庆的上元灯火铺满天空,秀美灵动的舞者一同仰望祈愿……元宵节期间,以国家一级文物“五星出东方利中国”汉代织锦护臂为题材创作的舞剧《五星出东方》登陆哔哩哔哩、河南卫视等多台元宵晚会,“锦绣”舞段火爆出圈,引发全网热议。 “锦绣”舞段是怎样创作出来的?舞剧这一艺术形式有何特点?重现汉朝风貌时,团队发挥了哪些奇思妙想? 繁华“锦绣”描绘共荣图景 记者从北京演艺集团获悉,《五星出东方》“锦绣”舞段的创作构思来源于“中国是礼仪之邦”的解读,肢体动作、形象气质、队形调度等都是围绕着展现大国气质来完成编排,舞者们垂眸而出、步伐轻缓蹁跹,传递出内敛而含蓄,具有独特古典韵味的美感,同时又以四肢和头部舞蹈动作,形成顿挫感和力量感,给观众以浓厚宫廷色彩下的庄重威仪,气场全开的感受。 舞剧《五星出东方》总编导王舸介绍,“锦绣”舞蹈属于汉唐舞的舞种,在创作中首先深度研究汉代时期的动作形象特征,进而追求整体气质的吻合,再通过对细节的处理,参考了古时建筑中的榫卯,在舞段中加入了井字格旋转调度,传递出舞蹈“稳定感”的气质,最后通过服化道整合呈现,再现大汉盛世歌舞宴乐的繁华景象。 舞剧中,当上元灯火铺满天空,“锦绣”舞者们齐齐仰望祈愿,充满了欢乐与期许,也传递出各民族和谐友爱、同生共荣的主题。 图为舞剧《五星出东方》剧照。 北京演艺集团供图汉韵红装重现盛世欢颜 “锦绣”舞段的服装和舞者妆容创作参考来源是主创们采风时在博物馆里见到的汉代木俑人像。木俑人像衣着纤细的汉服曲裾裙,款式包裹而限制,这是因为在古时宫廷里有很多礼仪制度,不能跑跳。 因此,舞剧《五星出东方》在服饰创作时充分尊重历史史实,把古时礼仪制度进行解读还原,形成了“锦绣”服装的独到特色。 在服装上,使用大面积红搭配白色做挑色,展现大汉风韵,款式与体现身体曲线的西方美学不同,采用宽袍大袖,刻意拉低服装腰线,以达到一种宽阔的东方美感。 在人物造型和化妆上,以汉时期审美为出发点,头饰设计为汉白玉质感纹样的造型,庄重而典雅,面部是极具汉时期代表性的妆容“长眉红妆”:这个妆容的特点就是大面积运用朱红色铺满眼下及脸颊,喜庆隆重又提气色,非常有氛围感。“锦绣”舞段以深度还原时期的文化审美,展开了一幅多姿多色的民族画卷,秀美汉韵红装,重现盛世欢颜。 图为舞剧《五星出东方》剧照。 北京演艺集团供图古典乐器演绎大国气质 “锦绣”这段舞蹈音乐优美而空灵,同时又带有压倒式的气魄感,有观众直言“鸡皮疙瘩起来了”。据介绍,音乐创作中,呈现这段舞蹈的核心语汇是“仪态”。舞段开始是从织布机发出“嘎吱嘎吱”的声音展开,之后古琴悠扬的声音响起,其余乐器慢慢融入,整体逐渐进入到一个恢弘磅礴的状态中。 据了解,这段舞的乐器中用到了古琴、箜篌、琵琶、萧等中国古典乐器,在作曲中都是单独呈现,也给舞蹈展示留下了更多空间并与音乐产生联动,给观众带来感官上的共情,悠扬乐声中联想到大汉风姿的仪态万千。 “锦绣”之美,美在展现大国气质,美在考究精致的细节,美在民族古典的乐声悠扬。据了解,除了展现大汉气魄的“锦绣”舞,舞剧《五星出东方》中还有曾登陆过《国家宝藏·展演季》和河南卫视《舞千年》等节目、充满西域风情的婀娜“灯舞”等,风格截然不同的舞段在同一部舞剧中集中展示,带来不同的观剧体验。 舞剧《五星出东方》由中共北京市委宣传部、中共新疆维吾尔自治区党委宣传部出品,北京演艺集团联合北京市援疆和田指挥部、和田地委宣传部共同制作,北京歌剧舞剧院、新疆新玉歌舞团演出。目前,该剧的50场全国巡演正在进行,后续将在济南、佛山、泉州、深圳等地进行演出。(完)
|